Thursday, November 14, 2013

Least walkable city in U.S. is - wait a minute, that's us!

Uptown is one of Charlotte's most walkable areas, along with First and Fourth wards. Photo: Nancy Pierce
(Friday, Nov. 15: I've updated this with comments from Charlotte transportation officials. To see that expanded version, visit the article in PlanCharlotte.org: "Charlotte trails nation in walkability rankings.")

Want to guess the large U.S. city rated worst for walkability by Walk Score, the national rating system?

That would be the Queen City. Take a look at the 2014 report. New York rated No. 1, followed by San Francisco, Boston, Washington and Miami.

But what does this ranking measure? The Walk Score website says it "measures the walkability of any address using a patent-pending system. For each address, Walk Score analyzes hundreds of walking routes to nearby amenities. Points are awarded based on the distance to amenities in each category. Amenities within a 5-minute walk (.25 miles) are given maximum points. A decay function is used to give points to more distant amenities, with no points given after a 30-minute walk.
Walk Score also measures pedestrian friendliness by analyzing population density and road metrics such as block length and intersection density. Data sources include Google, Education.com, Open Street Map, the U.S. Census, Localeze, and places added by the Walk Score user community."

If I read that correctly, Walk Score doesn't measure the existence of sidewalks (although Charlotte wouldn't rank very high in that regard either). So this city's typical Sun Belt-all-spread-out, low-density development means anything you'd want to walk to is probably farther away than in a more densely developed area.

Charlotte also would ran low in block length and intersection density - which essentially measures how well networked the city is with plenty of streets and street corners.Many parts of Charlotte developed during the cul-de-sac era, when streets intentionally did not connect to anything.
Even uptown, which at least had a strong grid when it was laid out a couple of centuries ago, has seen many instances of streets being eliminated to accommodate large-footprint projects such as ballparks, stadiums, convention centers and parks.

I'm seeking comment from Charlotte Department of Transportation officials, but I doubt this ranking will surprise them. 

5 comments:

George P. Burdell said...

WalkScore is far from infallible. It gave the intersection of Old Wake Forest Rd. & Capital Blvd. in Raleigh (near I-540) a walk score of 78 -- despite 7 through lanes, triple left turns, and a 165-foot ramp-to-ramp crossing distance.

Anonymous said...

WalkScore gives the Charlotte intersection of Central & Thomas a 94, which easily beats the NYC average of 88. In other words, there are pockets of "walker's paradise" even in Car-Lot, NC.

dnorton said...

I know this is something that you've probably put a good deal of thought into. What can we do to help make Charlotte a more walkable city?

Anonymous said...

One suggestion:

Connect South End to Uptown with a walkway. It makes no sense at all that we have a great walking/running/biking path along the light rail that suddenly gets cut off at I74. South End has seen a lot of development lately, and it's important we attach the vibrancy of this area directly to Uptown.

All they would have to do is build out the light rail bridge that crosses I74 so that it has pedestrian walkways on the side.

Anonymous said...

I'm little confused because the city evdently got Bronze level as walk friendly city here: http://www.walkfriendly.org/communities/list.cfm. Now how come it's not walkable???

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.